This blog post is about equilibriums.
Sometimes, words go missing from my mind. Ideas try to hook into words to make themselves tangible, but fail to grip onto anything, and instead send the letters clashing around my mind like in a pinball machine. Those are good days. My mind feels alive, and I start to believe again perhaps I am not as stupid as some evidence might suggest.
The thoughts sometimes lead to actions... but only sometimes.
We took a day off yesterday. We spent the afternoon seeing New Breed by Sydney Dance Company, and the evening at Kat's birthday barbecue. It was probably one of the most relaxed days both of us have had in the past months.
A year ago, I started working on VIVA full time believing that I would visit one venue or one event every day, and then spending the rest of my time working on the business. On average, I think I have visited two venues or attended two events every week... which is on par to when I was a lawyer. Spending a lot of hours working seems to have become a habit. This led to an interesting (and very recent) observation:
We each have an innate and immutable level of sociability.
There is a body of psychology research about the effect of winning the lottery on human happiness. The research showed that the external stimuli pushed and pulled on our level of happiness in the short term, but with the passing of time, we return to something like an innate level of happiness.
I think sociability behaves in a similar framework where each of us has an innate level of desire for being social. We may change our behaviour in the short term, our longer term behaviours return to a natural equilibrium.
If this is right, then this is very interesting... one of the hypothesis we used when we built VIVA was that happiness is directly proportional to sociability. Our goal was to make the world a happier place, and so if we increased sociability, then we increased happiness. BUT, if sociability returns to an equilibrium the same way that happiness returns to an equilibrium, then it would be foolish to expect that VIVA can change the behaviour of users to increase the quantum of social interactions permanently.
So, how will VIVA improve user happiness?
I wrote to Sam earlier today, "Hey man! Let me know if you want a break and come to the boat trip tomorrow. The offer is open, if you feel like it, alright?"
If we can take VIVA to the level of knowing when someone can benefit from being social, then even though we may not be able to permanently increase their happiness, we can help give them a temporary and necessary uptick in their happiness... and maybe that is the best we can hope to do.